The Witness


The "Witness" exists and does not exist! The reality does not meet our human logic canons. But that "witness" is not separate from what "it" witnesses. It is not a thing it can approached logically but only experientially. 
Brahman is sat-cit-ananda. Sat is "pure being, pure existence", cit is translated as consciousness (the "capacity" to "know to exists). Ananda is translated as bliss.
That Brahman is being / consciousness / "self-satisfactory" (it is NOT depending of anything, so it is complete, so "blessed",without "any lack"). 
So you could say that what exists (this indefinable "thing" in communication we can call brahman traslateble  with absolute, everything etc) is "characterized" just because of its EXISTING and SELF KNOWING
But this self-knowing is NOT our human "knowledge" or "knowing" or "conscience" made of words / thoughts / logic. 
But it is conscious of existing, without intermediation of thoughs/words.
This way to "know" is "understandable" when in meditation or thanks or because of mystical experiences we "enter" in that silence where with no words and thoughts we know to exist.
It can not be explained, it is not reproducible, it is not comunicable as well as you can never explain color to a blind man who "understand" the color just when he sees that colour (experience).
That experience is called Samadhi. (Monàs)

Crea il tuo sito web gratis! Questo sito è stato creato con Webnode. Crea il tuo sito gratuito oggi stesso! Inizia